On April 19th, the military and religious organizations in Taiwan launched a "siege" campaign, surrounded the "Legislative Yuan" and tried to prevent the Taiwan Province authorities from holding a meeting on annuity reform. However, under the "Legislative Yuan" surrounded by razor blades, horse refusal, snake cages and military police, the meeting was finally held. Huang Zhaoshun, a "legislator" of the Kuomintang, said that he had never held a meeting in the Iron Curtain Prison after being a "legislator" for eight times. She satirized the practice of the Taiwan authorities as "absurd and absurd again."
Moreover, Tsai Ing-wen, leader of Taiwan Province authorities, also came forward to condemn the violence of the protesters on 19th. In this regard, some Taiwanese media said that Tsai Ing-Wen will not forget it. She has a small nickname called "Violent Xiaoying". Tsai Ing-Wen once led the people to besiege the city and attacked the police with stones and other objects.
Taiwan authorities set up multi-layer horse refusal and snake cages (obstacles)
Huang Zhaoshun, the 8th legislator: Meeting in the Iron Curtain for the first time.
According to a report by Taiwanese media "United Daily News" on April 19th, Huang Zhaoshun, a legislator of the Kuomintang, said that when he was a legislator for eight times, he almost burst into tears when he saw that the Legislative Yuan was surrounded by horses, which was "absurd and absurd again".
Huang Zhaoshun questioned how many public hearings the Legislative Yuan had held. If the law can’t make people trust, how to make military officials trust is a comprehensive stigma of "public servants." Moreover, Huang Zhaoshun said that the public hearing held by the Taiwan Province authorities in Kaohsiung "even I can’t participate". Finally, she asked Su Jiaquan, the "Legislative Yuan", to remove the refusal of the "Legislative Yuan" because "there is no reason to hold a meeting in the iron curtain".
Wang Huimei, a legislator of the Kuomintang, also said that the "Legislative Yuan" is not the "Legislative Yuan of the Executive Yuan" but the "Legislative Yuan" of the whole people, "making it look like being in a prison".
Democratic Progressive Party used to regard the refusal of horses and snake cages as symbols of the "authoritarian era", but now it is the turn of the people in Lanying to say that "how high the refusal of horses is, how deep the people’s resentment is".
"Violent Xiaoying" accused violence
As for the afternoon of the 19th, Tsai Ing-Wen came forward and shouted, saying that people must not be allowed to use violence to delay the pace of reform. On the evening of 19th, Taiwanese media "United Daily News" said, "I laughed when violent Xiaoying accused me of violence!" Published an article on the topic, saying that Tsai Ing-Wen will probably never forget it. She has a little nickname called "Violent Xiaoying".
Tsai Ing-Wen
According to the article, at the "Chen Jianghui" on November 6, 2008, she launched a mass siege, attacked the police with stones and other objects, and then surrounded the Yuanshan Hotel. At night, people even threw dung and petrol bombs.
China Times News reported that more than 200 people were injured at the end of the day. Excuse me, did Tsai Ing-Wen publicly condemn himself at that time? At the same time, according to Tsai Ing-Wen’s standards on the 19th, should Tsai Ing-Wen be investigated at that time?
The United Daily News said that the sudden news that Tsai Ing-Wen condemned violence on the 19th inevitably made people laugh because it was too abrupt. If today’s push is measured by the scale of "violent Xiaoying" in that year, today’s people can be called "law-abiding", not to mention being dwarfed, I am afraid they are not even qualified as witches!
The article points out that it is understandable to condemn violence, but the definition of violence can’t always be like a trick in the belly pocket. It seems to be high and low, but it seems to be nothing. I want to go to the streets as justice, and you want to protest as violence. "Sunflower" climbed to the second floor of the forum and could read aloud: "When dictatorship becomes a reality, revolution is an obligation", but the retired military Catholic church didn’t even get a glimpse of the door of the forum.
The article said that the "bill" to be passed by the "Legislative Yuan" surrounded by resistance to horses and snake cages today is not a more arrogant dictatorship in the eyes of these protesters. But what about their revolution? The two struggles are an embarrassing contrast. Students’ struggle will completely castrate representative democracy. They are frolicking in the forum, and several "heavenly kings" such as Tsai Ing-Wen and Democratic Progressive Party are sitting at the door to protect them. However, this group of retirees were left on the street, and their livelihood in their later years was arbitrarily exploited by representative democracy. In the end, Tsai Ing-Wen was elegantly and ruthlessly crowned as an anti-reform violent person.
This so-called reform has torn the people into two camps that are hostile to each other and are ready to benefit from this confrontation. Tsai Ing-Wen wants to accomplish his best in one battle, but it casts a terrible shadow. Under the situation that justice and benefit are deprived, the energy of the rebel group will flow downward and spread throughout the whole society, making this society an avenger society, thus laying an irreparable foreshadowing for the final decline of Taiwan Province.