Editor’s Note: Medical troubles, school troubles, house troubles and car troubles … … Everything must be "noisy". Some people have no way to defend their rights and have to make trouble, while others are malicious and profit from "noisy". "CCTV Online Review" specially launched a series of observations and comments on "What’s the trouble?", which provided a multi-angle and all-round perspective of this public psychological and social phenomenon.
Today is the first article.
The traditional Chinese character for "Nao" is Nao, and the word "Dou" is framed with a "city" in it. As the name implies, breaking the rules in public.
Because of a house purchase dispute, I sat down on a sand table worth tens of thousands of dollars, put the mourning hall in a hospital and carried the coffin to a school, and made a scene in the street without going through legal procedures in case of an accident … … From "medical quarrels" and "school quarrels" to "house quarrels" and "car quarrels", it has become a relatively common social phenomenon. Although it is repugnant to most people, it has been tried and repeated.
Some people joked that "distribution according to noise" has become a new distribution method. But this is by no means a characteristic of China, nor is it the so-called national inferiority.The impulse of people to fight for their own interests is written in their genes, and it is a simple truth that there is sugar to eat at the end and milk for crying children.
The problem lies in why and how to make trouble. The rapid economic and social development in China has produced many new conflicts and contradictions, such as land expropriation, house demolition, labor relations, contract disputes, poverty relief, ethnic disputes and so on. Some ordinary people put down their dignity and decency and took to the streets to make a big fuss, simply because their legitimate rights and interests were not guaranteed and they had no choice but to complain. The female owner of Mercedes-Benz, who caused widespread public discussion before, is a typical "troublemaker" who was forced out by ineffective rights protection.
There are still some people who are really unreasonable. The "noisy" culture even gave birth to a group of professional troublemakers, mostly composed of social idlers. Under the guise of safeguarding rights, they used banners, slogans, leaflets, sit-ins and even rolling around to put pressure on functional departments and make profits by "noisy". Under the pressure of maintaining stability and public opinion, many parties will choose to compromise and tend to "spend money to buy peace."
In short, whatever is reasonable or unreasonable, as long as things that can’t be done are provoked, they are often done, taken seriously, or even beyond the reasonable scope. This sends a signal of governance: "make a small fuss and solve it, make a big fuss and solve it, and don’t make trouble and don’t solve it." Even if it is not affordable, it will be solved after the event.
This time and again, the operation of "you retreat from me" and "you are fierce and arrogant" has indeed contributed to the smooth resolution of some cases and made some people succeed in defending their rights. However, the cost is huge, which leads to the inertia of many people, develops the psychology of "making trouble without loss", and intensifies social hostility and distrust between people.
If we make another detailed account,It involves more manpower, material resources and financial resources to make a fuss about something, and pressing the gourd to float the gourd ladle increases the burden on the grassroots for no reason.; "Make trouble and solve it" and solve it well beyond normal, which will not only make fewer people take the normal route, but also punish those who take the normal route in disguise.
To put it further, "distribution according to troubles" runs counter to the modern governance principle of building a society ruled by law. No matter who makes troubles or compromises with troubles, it is inevitable to ignore the rules and despise the law.It is an inefficient governance model that hides the ear and steals the bell.In the long run, laws and regulations will lose their dignity and authority, which is the fundamental guarantee for the healthy operation of society, the healthy development of the country and the people to live and work in peace.
Under the background of China’s striding towards the modernization of the national governance system, we urgently need to get out of this governance cycle, and make the rule of law the fundamental guarantee for maintaining social fairness and justice, so that those who have grievances don’t have to make trouble, so that those bad elements who deliberately make trouble don’t dare to make trouble, so that those cadres who really do things for the people are not afraid to make trouble and shape a clean and upright social ecology.
