标签： 南京喝茶服务2021

Online celebrity’s Cat Cafe： How to calculate the responsibility of teasing the cat to be scratched？

　　In recent years, the popularity of pet coffee shops has remained high. In most pet coffee shops, besides selling small animals, it is even more exciting that customers can get in close contact with small animals when they arrive at the store. However, behind these warm and lovely pictures, there are also many hidden dangers.

　　A few days ago, a user nicknamed "sccggbb" commented on a shop on an APP platform, reflecting the experience that his boyfriend was scratched by a cat when he and his boyfriend went to a cat cafe for consumption.

　　According to sccggbb’s description, I have visited this cat and coffee shop twice. The first time I went with a friend, "My friend was caught by a cat, but there was no bleeding"; The second time I went with my boyfriend, "My boyfriend was directly scratched by a cat and bled". In these two experiences when her companion was scratched by a cat, what made her angry was the way the shopkeeper handled it. The user’s message information shows that after the first friend was scratched by a cat, "the shopkeeper gave an alcohol cotton pad to wipe it", and after the second boyfriend was scratched, the shopkeeper said that the use method of teasing the cat stick was wrong.

　　So, what exactly happened? As a new format, what measures will cat coffee generally take to reduce the chances of customers being scratched by cats? Who is responsible for the customer being scratched by a cat in a cat cafe?

　　cause

　　It’s the wrong way to tease the cat

　　Or was it thrown for no reason?

　　On July 4, the reporter contacted an APP user nicknamed "sccggbb", who refused to be interviewed on this matter.

　　After combing the replies from an APP platform to the user, the reporter learned that the user "sccggbb" and her boyfriend bought a set meal coupon for two people worth 88 yuan through the platform on the afternoon of Dragon Boat Festival (June 25th) and went to the store for consumption. After completing the use registration of the set meal coupon, they each got a cat-teasing stick from the shopkeeper.

　　Ms. Fu, the owner of the store, recalled the scene to the reporter and added that while giving the cat-teasing stick, she also introduced the personality characteristics of each cat in the store to the two of them, and reminded them to pay attention to safety in the process of teasing cats. On the dining table in the store, there are also tips about the cat’s personality characteristics and the precautions for teasing cats.

　　Ms. Fu told the reporter that through the monitoring of the store at that time, we can see that the boyfriend of the user "sccggbb" had the action of shaking the cat stick towards his body before being scratched by the cat, and thought that this was the main reason for being scratched by the cat. "Generally, the cat-teasing stick is shaken far away to ensure that you are not scratched by the cat." Ms. Fu admitted that when giving the cat-teasing stick to the two, she did not remind them of the possible risks of using the cat-teasing stick incorrectly.

　　Ms. Fu’s statement is different from the comments made by the user "sccggbb" on an APP. According to the comments of sccggbb, "I didn’t mean to tease the cat at that time, but the cat jumped on me."

　　dispute

　　Shopkeeper: I have returned the package coupon and am willing to send it to the doctor.

　　Customer: You should compensate for the cost of vaccination.

　　However, how to get injured is not the focus of the debate between the two sides. What makes the user "sccggbb" dissatisfied is mainly the way the shopkeeper handled his boyfriend after he was injured: "I didn’t see that you had anything to deal with within an hour of being scratched by a cat, so you should take the initiative to say that you would take us for vaccination."

　　In this regard, Ms. Fu stressed in an interview that she started to communicate with her "sccggbb" boyfriend less than three minutes after he was scratched by a cat, and left after the customer said "It doesn’t matter, the cat has no problem with vaccination".

　　Ms. Fu said that the store monitoring showed that after confirming the situation with "sccggbb" and her boyfriend, the two continued to tease the cat in the store and left after about half an hour. When they left, they were "really sorry", so they returned "sccggbb" and 88 yuan, who bought the package coupon with her boyfriend that day, and said that "you can go to the hospital to ask if you are not at ease."

　　Ms. Fu told reporters that all the cats in her shop had received four doses of vaccine at the end of July 2019 (including the cat rhinotracheitis vaccine, the mosaic virus vaccine and the panleukopenia vaccine commonly known as "Miaosanduo", as well as the rabies vaccine).

　　In response to Ms. Fu’s statement, "sccggbb" expressed different views. "Even if the cat has been vaccinated, there is a certain chance that it will be infected with rabies if it is exposed at the third level, and it has already caught bleeding." "sccggbb" said that it was precisely because of the store’s unacceptable handling method that it gave the store a bad review and asked the store to compensate for the cost of rabies vaccine and tetanus vaccine according to the market price.

　　Lawyer’s statement

　　Under the condition that the customer is not at fault

　　Shops should bear the responsibility.

　　Ms. Fu told reporters that she had stopped the operation of the store two or three days after the dispute with "sccggbb". "It has been nearly a year since I opened the store, and I have been troubled by various situations, especially after this incident. I decided to close this store."

　　Ms. Fu said that "sccggbb" has reflected the above disputes to the platform and consumer rights protection organizations. "If the relevant departments determine that I do have the obligation to pay compensation, I will bear the corresponding compensation, and it will not be affected by closing the store."

　　In fact, the dispute between Ms. Fu and "sccggbb" is not accidental, and the problem of cats scratching customers often occurs in cat cafes. Taking Chengdu as an example, the reporter searched for "cat coffee" on an APP platform and got 133 related stores.

　　How do these 133 stores deal with customers being scratched by cats? The reporter immediately dialed the phone number of a cat and coffee merchant located in the third section of Hongxing Road.

　　The person in charge of the store told the reporter that it is a common problem for customers to be scratched by cats in cat coffee. Usually, after the customer tells the clerk that he has been scratched by a cat, the clerk will disinfect the customer’s wound at the first time. "The cats in our store will be vaccinated once every six months, and we will know from frequent contact with cats that it will not be infected if they are scratched by cats, so routine disinfection is enough." The person in charge said that when customers ask for rabies vaccination, the store will also compensate them accordingly.

　　The person in charge said, "As long as the customer’s requirements are reasonable, the store will try its best to meet them in order to avoid disputes." He also told reporters that in a prominent position at the entrance of their store, customers will be prompted to "don’t hug the cat forcibly, if there is a risk, you will be at your own risk." At the same time, for the sake of customer safety, children under the age of 8 are not allowed to enter the store. After contacting a number of cat cafes in Chengdu, the reporter found that all cats and cafes had scratched customers, and almost all shops had disclaimers. Then, does such a statement, as expressed in the text itself, make the cat and coffee shop exempt from liability when the cat hurts people?

　　The reporter consulted Song Hongyu, a lawyer of Taihetai Law Firm. Song Hongyu said that customers are mainly divided into two categories when cats are scratched by cats. In the first category, customers are indeed scratched because of their own way of teasing cats, which leads to the cat’s stress response; The second category is that customers are scratched by cats just because they are in the store without teasing them. "As long as the customer is not at fault, the store should bear the responsibility that the cats it raises infringe on the rights and interests of others." (Chengdu Business Daily-Red Star Journalist Ye Yan Intern reporter Cheng Bo)

Anti-monopoly breaks the ills of big data ＂killing＂

　　On December 17th, "Big Data Killing" was searched by Weibo again, this time the protagonist was Meituan. Taxi software takes different pricing for the same customers, and booking hotel members costs more than ordinary users … … In recent years, "big data killing" has been frequently searched. Experts pointed out that the Anti-monopoly Guide on Platform Economy (Draft for Comment) (hereinafter referred to as the Anti-monopoly Guide) refines the provisions of the Anti-monopoly Law regulating Internet violations and promotes the platform to better assume social responsibilities. In order to eradicate the chaos of "big data killing", it is essential to improve laws and regulations and strengthen law enforcement, and urge enterprises to be honest and self-disciplined.

　　"Big data killing" frequency hot search

　　On December 17th, an article titled "I was cut by a member of Meituan" was screened on social media. Based on his own experience of ordering takeout, the author found that in the same store on Meituan, with the same delivery address and at the same time, the delivery fee for members was higher than that for non-members. According to the article, it was thought that opening take-away members would save money, but the delivery fee of almost all take-away merchants nearby was higher than that of non-members from 1 yuan to 5 yuan.

　　At that time, "Meituan was killed by explosion" and quickly boarded the hot search list of Weibo on that day. Netizens complained in Weibo, Zhihu, black cats, friends circle, etc. about the differential treatment of old members by Meituan: the delivery fee is higher, the price increases after eating in the same store for two or three times, the full amount of membership is reduced after opening, and even the renewal of membership fee has felt that Meituan’s "likes the new and hates the old". Moreover, this is not only the case with the US Mission, but also the above problems when you are hungry.

　　Later, Meituan’s take-out issued a statement in response, saying that the difference in delivery fee has nothing to do with membership. Because of the positioning cache in the software, the user’s last historical positioning was wrongly used, which deviated from the user’s actual position, resulting in inaccurate estimation of delivery fee. When placing an order, it will be calculated according to the real delivery address and will not be affected.

　　The reporter learned that consumers’ complaints about "big data killing" are not just on the takeaway platform. During the "double 11" this year, Ms. Han, a Beijing consumer, found that she booked a hotel through an App, and the price difference was about 1000 yuan.

　　On September 15th, CCTV named the phenomenon of "big data killing" on the online travel platform, and mentioned that the online travel platform set differentiated prices for the same product or service under the same conditions for tourists with different consumption characteristics. On the same day, a poll conducted on the Weibo showed that 15,000 people thought they had encountered obvious price differences, accounting for nearly 80% of all voters.

　　In March 2019, the survey results of "Big Data Killing" released by Beijing Consumers Association showed that 88.32% of the respondents thought that "Big Data Killing" was common or very common, and 56.92% of the respondents said that they had been killed by "Big Data". At the same time, respondents believe that online shopping platforms, online travel and online car rides have the most problems in consumer "big data killing", and online travel ranks first.

　　On December 20, 2018, "Big Data Killing" was elected as the top ten buzzwords in social life in 2018.

　　… …

　　In addition, similar "killing" phenomena have appeared on many platforms such as air tickets and movies.

　　"Big data killing" needs to be standardized

　　Nowadays, big data algorithms are becoming more and more advanced, and information customization can meet people’s diversified and personalized needs. Liu Peng, an expert in the field of big data and artificial intelligence, said that the Internet platform can accurately portray netizens by collecting social data and behavioral data, thus reducing the cost of users’ access to information, improving the quality of service to users and adding convenience to life.

　　According to Wang Wei, director of the Information Security Department of Beijing Jiaotong University, "killing big data" is not technically difficult. He pointed out that after mastering personal information, behavior habits and other data, the platform judges its preferences, user adhesion, price sensitivity, etc., and uses big data technology to achieve "thousands of people", so that different prices or search results seen by different users can be "killed".

　　Shen Hao, a professor at the Big Data Research Center of Communication University of China, has the same view. He further pointed out that the Internet platform can easily judge whether it is a "stranger" or a "regular customer" through the amount of user data and the frequency of data updates. As a result, the platform makes a lot of money, the interests of merchants and consumers are damaged, and it is easy to lead to monopoly.

　　Shen Hao introduced that generally speaking, there are two "kill-cooked" routines of the platform: one is to raise prices for users who are not sensitive to prices, and the other is to cultivate old users to develop consumption habits and reduce preferential treatment for old users, that is, to "treat new users better than old users". The "new users" here refer not only to newly registered users, but also to users who have stopped using them for a period of time and then returned.

　　From the legislative practice of European and American countries, once the behaviors such as "killing big data" are identified as unfair behaviors such as price discrimination, they will be strictly prohibited.

　　In 1914, the United States promulgated the Clayton Act, which clarified the impermissible practices such as price discrimination, exclusive transactions, and mergers and acquisitions that would seriously weaken competition. Amazon was exposed to differential pricing in 2000, and the prices displayed before and after users deleted cookie data were different. Amazon CEO Bezos apologized afterwards and said that all this was just an "experiment."

　　In May 2018, the EU General Data Protection Regulation came into effect, and the rights of Internet organizations to freely collect, analyze and manage user information will be strictly limited and regulated. On December 15, 2020, the European Union promulgated the draft Digital Market Law. Hong Yanqing, a senior researcher at the Peking University Institute of Rule of Law and Development, said that the explanatory memorandum of the draft pointed out that a few large platforms are increasingly serving as portals or "gatekeepers" between enterprise users and end users. These "gatekeepers" have substantial control over the access to the digital market, which leads many enterprise users to have greater dependence on these "gatekeepers" and in some cases lead to unfair behavior towards enterprise users. Article 55 of the draft clearly requires the gatekeeper to use data: in order to ensure that enterprise users can obtain relevant data, the gatekeeper should allow them to obtain data free of charge without hindrance according to the requirements of enterprise users, and should also allow the third party contracted by enterprise users to access these data. The "gatekeeper" should also facilitate real-time access to these data through appropriate technical measures.

　　At present, there are laws such as E-commerce Law and Consumer Protection Law that regulate the "big data killing" behavior in China, but in fact, consumers often face the problem of proof when they encounter "big data killing".

　　In 2019, when the Beijing Consumers Association released the survey results of "Big Data Killing", it pointed out that operators usually defend themselves on the grounds of product model or configuration, enjoying package discounts, and different time points, and do not disclose specific algorithms, rules and data. On the contrary, consumer rights protection is often in a difficult position to prove. The reporter inquired about the referee’s document network and found that some consumers had sued a take-away platform to the court on the grounds of "big data killing", but because of the difficulty of proof, both the first instance and the second instance lost.

　　Anti-monopoly has a bright sword for "killing big data"

　　In this context, the Anti-monopoly Law (Revised Draft) that has been completed and the Anti-monopoly Guide that has just finished soliciting opinions bear the expectations of all sectors of society.

　　Zhai Wei, executive director of the Competition Law Research Center of East China University of Political Science and Law, pointed out that the Anti-Monopoly Guide refines the relevant provisions of the Anti-Monopoly Law regulating the Internet platform. Article 17 of the guide clearly points out that operators in the market-dominant platform economy may implement differential transaction prices or other trading conditions, new and old trading counterparts, differential standards, rules and algorithms, and differential payment conditions and trading methods based on big data and algorithms, according to the payment ability, consumption preferences and usage habits of the trading counterparts.

　　At the same time, the Anti-Monopoly Law (Revised Draft) clarifies four possible legitimate reasons for operators in the field of platform economy to implement differential treatment, namely, to implement different trading conditions according to the actual needs of the trading counterparts and in line with legitimate trading habits and industry practices, to carry out preferential activities for the first transaction of new users within a reasonable period of time, to carry out random transactions based on the rules of fairness, reasonableness and non-discrimination on the platform, and other reasons that can prove the legitimacy of the behavior.

　　Associate Professor Zhong Gang, executive director of the Competition Law Research Center of East China University of Political Science and Law, further explained that the clear justification is not to give the merchants an opportunity, but to follow the market logic and maintain the normal profit space of the merchants. According to Zhong Gang, judging whether "big data killing" is established in legal procedures will also give both parties the same right of proof.

　　Enterprises should attach importance to anti-monopoly compliance

　　The strong scale effect and network effect of the Internet industry itself are inherently exclusive to competition. Xiong Hongru, an associate researcher in the Innovation and Development Research Department of the State Council Development Research Center, pointed out that "the big is not a problem, but the big bullying the small, algorithm collusion and even governance risks within the platform".

　　"The Anti-Monopoly Law protects the interests of consumers." Zhang Dezhi, director of the Consumer Supervision Department of the China Consumers Association, said, "I hope that after the revision of the Anti-Monopoly Law and the promulgation of the Anti-Monopoly Guide, it will be reloaded to help create a business atmosphere of fair competition and let consumers become real beneficiaries."

　　Yu Zuo, Secretary-General of the Competition Policy Committee of China Institute of Industrial Economics, pointed out that monopoly enterprises abuse their dominant market position and set unreasonable high prices, which will definitely damage the interests of consumers in the end. It is expected that in the future, law enforcement departments will strengthen law enforcement in accordance with the revised Anti-Monopoly Law and the Anti-Monopoly Guide, and strictly investigate behaviors such as "big data killing" involving price discrimination and abuse of market dominance, so as to make the market compete fairly, improve product quality and benefit consumers.

　　"The life of law lies in its implementation. Administration according to law is the key link of law implementation, and consciously abiding by the law is an important condition for law implementation. " Zhong Chun, an associate professor at Jinan University Law School, said that Internet companies are not short of professional knowledge or professionals, and they should strive to comply with regulatory requirements in anti-monopoly compliance in the future.

　　With the increasing attention of the regulatory authorities and the maturity of the market, the domestic anti-monopoly laws and regulations and the level of law enforcement will be improved and improved rapidly. Lv Laiming, a professor at the Law School of Beijing Technology and Business University and vice president of the Beijing E-commerce Law Research Association, suggested that "fines are not the only way. When enforcing the law or supervising, administrative supervision departments can also take interviews and guidance to further urge them to rectify according to law."

　　To solve the chaos of "big data killing", in addition to improving laws and regulations and strengthening law enforcement, it is more important for enterprises to abide by the law, be honest and self-disciplined.

　　"Internet platform enterprises should strictly abide by anti-monopoly laws and regulations and maintain fair competition in the market." When answering a reporter’s question, the relevant person in charge of the Anti-monopoly Bureau of the General Administration of Market Supervision suggested that enterprises should sort out their own business practices in accordance with the provisions of the Anti-monopoly Law and not engage in monopolistic behaviors prohibited by the Anti-monopoly Law. At the same time, respect the law, abide by the law, and effectively strengthen anti-monopoly compliance management in accordance with the requirements of the Anti-monopoly Compliance Guide for Operators.

　　Xue Jun, director of Peking University E-commerce Law Research Center, suggested that enterprises should establish a socialized appraisal mechanism according to the application scenarios of the algorithm and its impact on citizens’ basic rights and interests, so as to avoid the possible antitrust consequences of the algorithm.

　　Only when laws and regulations are "long teeth", supervision plays an anti-monopoly combination boxing, and enterprises are promoted to self-discipline and social co-governance, can we get rid of the stubborn disease of "killing big data", change "killing" into "familiarity" and turn "first-time customers" into "repeat customers".

Democratic Progressive Party’s Taiwan Affairs Office responded to cross-strait hot spots and denounced the authorities for smashing Taiwan Province’s youth rice bowl.

　　BEIJING, Nov. 27 (Xinhua)-The Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council held a regular press conference on the 27th. Spokesperson Zhu Fenglian answered reporters’ questions on hot issues such as the sinking of a Taiwanese cargo ship in Fujian waters, the "swindler turned spy" incident, the so-called "reverse osmosis law" hyped by the Democratic Progressive Party authorities, and the litigation of 30 Taiwan compatriots working in the mainland by the Taiwan authorities.

Zhu Fenglian, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, invited reporters to ask questions. China Net Sun Yushe

　　Zhu Fenglian, spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, invited reporters to ask questions. China Net Sun Yushe

　　— — Focus on cross-strait relations

　　[Implementing the "26 Measures" to Include Baseball in the 2020 Hangzhou Asian Games]

　　Zhu Fenglian said that after the promulgation and implementation of the "26 measures", all localities and departments are stepping up efforts to put all measures in place. Fujian province has carried out pilot tests in some areas and has made some concrete progress. In addition, the mainland sports authorities have responded to the concerns of the sports community in Taiwan Province, and have promoted baseball to be included in the events of the 2020 Hangzhou Asian Games.

　　[Talking about the death of Chen Mingzhong: His patriotic feelings deserve to be remembered by compatriots on both sides of the strait forever]

　　Zhu Fenglian said that Mr. Chen Mingzhong, former consultant of Taiwan Province Mutual Aid Association for Political Victims and former president of Xia Chao Federation, died in Shanghai on November 21, 2019. The Taiwan Affairs Office of the Central Committee and the Taiwan Affairs Office would like to express their deep condolences. Mr. Chen Mingzhong is a loyal patriot, a shining example of Taiwan Province people’s anti-colonialism and anti-oppression, and an outstanding representative of Taiwan Province’s patriotic reunification camp. He devoted his whole life to the lofty cause of realizing the complete reunification of the motherland and the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation. His patriotic feelings deserve to be remembered by compatriots on both sides of the strait forever.

　　[Compatriots on both sides of the strait should seek peace, protect peace and share peace]

　　A few days ago, South Korea’s Yu said that before the mainland gave up the use of force to solve the Taiwan Province issue, there were no conditions for the two sides to sign a peace agreement. Zhu Fenglian said that not promising to give up force and keeping the option of taking all necessary measures are aimed at foreign interference and a handful of "Taiwan independence" separatist forces and their separatist activities, and are by no means aimed at Taiwan Province compatriots. Compatriots on both sides of the strait want to seek peace, protect peace and share peace.

　　[The mainland is the best choice for Taiwan compatriots and enterprises to invest in business]

　　The mainland recently released the results of the fourth economic census. Although the number of investment enterprises in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao increased from 97,000 at the end of 2013 to 119,000, the proportion of all enterprises declined, from 1.2% to 0.6%. Zhu Fenglian said that the mainland was, is and will remain the best choice for Taiwan compatriots and enterprises to invest and start businesses. It is hoped that Taiwan enterprises from Taiwan can give full play to their own advantages, catch the express train to expand the domestic demand market in the mainland, and achieve greater development in the rapid development of integration into the mainland.

　　[Taiwan cargo ship sank in Fujian waters and two bodies have been found]

　　Zhu Fenglian pointed out that at 21: 50 on November 20, a cargo ship from Guangdong collided with the cargo ship "Li Salary" from Taiwan Province about 0.66 nautical mile south of Chuanshi Island in Minjiang Estuary, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province. Unfortunately, the "Li Salary" sank into the water, causing nine crew members on board to fall into the water. On the morning of the 21st, seven crew members were rescued and properly placed. Two Taiwan Province crew members are missing. The body of one of the crew members was found on the evening of 22nd, and another body was found this morning. The identity is still being confirmed.

The press conference of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. China Net Sun Yushe

　　The press conference of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. China Net Sun Yushe

　　— — Reject the Democratic Progressive Party authorities

　　[Tell the Democratic Progressive Party authorities to stop interfering in the situation in Hong Kong and stop political manipulation]

　　On the 27th, Zhu Fenglian responded to questions about the situation in Hong Kong. She said that the Democratic Progressive Party authorities, relying on foreign self-respect, kept interfering in Hong Kong affairs to gain political self-interest, and their attempts would not succeed. We are telling the Democratic Progressive Party authorities to stop interfering in the situation in Hong Kong and stop political manipulation.

　　[In response to Democratic Progressive Party authorities’ hype about "reverse osmosis law": creating "green terror"]

　　Democratic Progressive Party’s legislature in Taiwan introduced the draft "Reverse Osmosis Law" to impose more restrictions on cross-strait exchanges. Zhu Fenglian pointed out that the Democratic Progressive Party authorities have constantly incited cross-strait confrontation and created cross-strait hostility by manipulating the so-called "agents of the Chinese Communist Party" to amend the law, which has met with strong opposition from all walks of life in Taiwan Province. The Democratic Progressive Party authorities’ attempt to seek election self-interest is impossible.

　　【"A liar becomes a spy" is an absurd and full of loopholes.】

　　Regarding Wang Liqiang’s self-proclaimed "China spy", Zhu Fenglian said that this was an absurd and full of loopholes "script" concocted by anti-China forces. However, the Democratic Progressive Party authorities, tied together with fraudsters, have engaged in political manipulation wantonly, with the intention of creating the illusion of "the mainland intervening in the elections in Taiwan Province" and seeking illegitimate election interests.

　　[Talk about 30 Taiwan compatriots serving in the mainland being sued by the Taiwan authorities: smashing Taiwan Province’s youth rice bowl]

　　Thirty Taiwan compatriots filed an administrative lawsuit after being punished by the Taiwan Province authorities for serving as the assistant director of the mainland community, but all of them were rejected by the internal affairs department of Taiwan Province recently. The Democratic Progressive Party authorities also claimed that they would continue to investigate the so-called Taiwan Province people who illegally went to the mainland to hold relevant posts. Zhu Fenglian said that the Democratic Progressive Party authorities set up checkpoints everywhere, threatening and intimidating with so-called "violation of the law", and in doing so, they were actually smashing the rice bowls of young people in Taiwan Province.

　　[Responding to Tsai Ing-Wen’s vigorous promotion of economic achievements during his tenure]

　　Recently, Tsai Ing-Wen has vigorously publicized her economic achievements during her term of office, not only claiming that Taiwanese capital has returned to 700 billion yuan, but also saying that Taiwan Province’s economic growth rate is expected to reach the top of the "Four Little Dragons in Asia" this year. Zhu Fenglian said that it is not up to the Democratic Progressive Party authorities to decide where Taiwanese businessmen will invest and where they will lay out. Where the business environment is better and where it is more conducive to their long-term development, I believe that the vast number of Taiwanese businessmen and enterprises will make their own judgments and make wise choices.

　　[Talking about the logo "China Taiwan Province" mobile phone was stopped by the Taiwan authorities: unpopular]

　　Some Huawei mobile phones marked Taiwan Province as "Taiwan Province, China", and the Taiwan authorities forced telecom operators to stop selling these Huawei mobile phones. Zhu Fenglian said that the Democratic Progressive Party authorities’ practice of sabotaging normal cross-strait economic and trade exchanges for political purposes harms the common interests of compatriots on both sides of the strait and is unpopular.